James's theorem

From HandWiki

In mathematics, particularly functional analysis, James' theorem, named for Robert C. James, states that a Banach space [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is reflexive if and only if every continuous linear functional's norm on [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] attains its supremum on the closed unit ball in [math]\displaystyle{ X. }[/math] A stronger version of the theorem states that a weakly closed subset [math]\displaystyle{ C }[/math] of a Banach space [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is weakly compact if and only if the dual norm each continuous linear functional on [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] attains a maximum on [math]\displaystyle{ C. }[/math]

The hypothesis of completeness in the theorem cannot be dropped.[1]

Statements

The space [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] considered can be a real or complex Banach space. Its continuous dual space is denoted by [math]\displaystyle{ X^{\prime}. }[/math] The topological dual of ℝ-Banach space deduced from [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] by any restriction scalar will be denoted [math]\displaystyle{ X^{\prime}_{\R}. }[/math] (It is of interest only if [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is a complex space because if [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is a [math]\displaystyle{ \R }[/math]-space then [math]\displaystyle{ X^{\prime}_{\R} = X^{\prime}. }[/math])

James compactness criterion — Let [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] be a Banach space and [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] a weakly closed nonempty subset of [math]\displaystyle{ X. }[/math] The following conditions are equivalent:

  • [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is weakly compact.
  • For every [math]\displaystyle{ f \in X^{\prime}, }[/math] there exists an element [math]\displaystyle{ a_0 \in A }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ \left|f\left(a_0\right)\right| = \sup_{a \in A} |f(a)|. }[/math]
  • For any [math]\displaystyle{ f \in X^{\prime}_{\R}, }[/math] there exists an element [math]\displaystyle{ a_0 \in A }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ f\left(a_0\right) = \sup_{a \in A} |f(a)|. }[/math]
  • For any [math]\displaystyle{ f \in X^{\prime}_{\R}, }[/math] there exists an element [math]\displaystyle{ a_0 \in A }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ f\left(a_0\right) = \sup_{a \in A} f(a). }[/math]

A Banach space being reflexive if and only if its closed unit ball is weakly compact one deduces from this, since the norm of a continuous linear form is the upper bound of its modulus on this ball:

James' theorem — A Banach space [math]\displaystyle{ X }[/math] is reflexive if and only if for all [math]\displaystyle{ f \in X^{\prime}, }[/math] there exists an element [math]\displaystyle{ a \in X }[/math] of norm [math]\displaystyle{ \|a\| \leq 1 }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ f(a) = \|f\|. }[/math]

History

Historically, these sentences were proved in reverse order. In 1957, James had proved the reflexivity criterion for separable Banach spaces[2] and 1964 for general Banach spaces.[3] Since the reflexivity is equivalent to the weak compactness of the unit sphere, Victor L. Klee reformulated this as a compactness criterion for the unit sphere in 1962 and assumes that this criterion characterizes any weakly compact quantities.[4] This was then actually proved by James in 1964.[5]

See also

Notes

  1. (James 1971)
  2. (James 1957)
  3. (James 1964)
  4. (Klee 1962)
  5. (James 1964)

References